COMMLAW 7012 Corporations Law

Academic Anxiety?

Get an original paper within hours and nail the task

156 experts online

Free Samples

COMMLAW 7012 Corporations Law

.cms-body-content table{width:100%!important;} #subhidecontent{ position: relative;
overflow-x: auto;
width: 100%;}

COMMLAW 7012 Corporations Law

0 Download9 Pages / 2,081 Words

Course Code: COMMLAW7012
University: The University Of Adelaide is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university

Country: Australia


“There has been much debate in recent years as to whether Australian corporate law should be amended to explicitly permit directors to take into account broader stakeholder interests in their corporate decision making …”
Jasper Hedges, Helen Bird, George Gilligan, Andrew Godwin and Ian Ramsay, ‘The Policy And Practice Of Enforcement Of Directors Duties by Statutory Agencies In Australia: An Empirical Analysis’ (2017) 40:905 Melbourne University Law Review 905,966.
Katie Watson, ‘The Historical Development of Corporate Law In Australia: Politics and Possibilities’ (2017) 32 Australian Journal of Corporate Law 122.
Pamela Hanrahan, ‘Corporate Governance In These Exciting Times’ (2017) 32 Australian Journal of Corporate Law 142.
Riana Cermak, ‘Directors’ Duties to Respect Human Rights in Offshore Operations and Supply Chains: An Emerging Paradigm’ (2018) 36 Company and Securities Law Journal 124.
ASX Corporate Governance principles and Recommendations 3rd ed


A company is a business structure that works with the minds of its directors and officers. Directors and officers of a company do act on behalf of the company and therefore considered as agents of the same. This is the reason that these people have a fiduciary relationship with the company. They are required to act in the best interest of the company. In every nation, a separate legislation is there to regulate the affairs of the company. Corporations Act 2001s is the federal level legislation of Australia. This act imposes liabilities on officers and directors of an Australian company under various sections.
However, in the recent times, many of the cases have been reported the cause of which the scope of this act has been questioned. Many of the section such as 180, 181, 182, 183, 674, 1043 and so on are there in which a director/officers of corporations are required to perform their duties. Most of these sections are there to protect the interest of shareholders only. This is a major issue in the field of corporate governance. According to the principles of corporate governance, a company must act in a manner keeping the interest of all stakeholders in view but not only the shareholders. The report presented hereby consist a snap of current scenery, the expectations of stakeholder from the act and conclusion thereof.
Responsibility under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
This act provides a set of duties and obligations for the directors and officers of the company. The reason behind the imposition of duties is that these people are liable to manage the affairs of the company. A company is an artificial person, which depends on its directors. Although in addition to being an artificial person, a company is also a separate legal personality. The same can enter into a contract with a third party. Further, the same can also run the business in it is own name. Law gives birth to a company. A person who deals with a company actually deals with the directors of the same. A company can sue and can be sued by a person. As directors have huge powers to take decisions on behalf of a company, the same is liable to perform their duties in a manner that brings the best positive results to the same.
Some general duties of a director and officer of a company are defined under the Division 1 of Part 2D of the act. Section 180 (1) of the act says that a director and officer of a company that they must discharge their obligation and duties with due care and diligence. The section ultimately demands such people to act like a reasonable person. Section 181 of the act is also an important one in the area of director duties. This section says that it is expected from every director and officer of a company to do the acts in the good faith of the company and for an appropriate purpose. On the other side, section 182 of the act states that no director, secretary, employee, or an officer of a company must ever misuse their position in the company to earn personal benefits.
Where section 182 prohibits the improper use of position, similarly section 183 of the act prohibits the improper use of available information and provides that an officer, an employee, a director, or the secretary of the company must not use the business information for their personal benefits.
The duties mentioned under section 180 to 183 are the general duties. There are many other sections, which describes the duties of directors and officers. These sections included 191, 195, 209, 588G and many others. Directors and officers of every Australian company are required to follow the provisions of discussed section, elsewhere they will be held liable for the breach of duty.
Responsibility under Corporate Governance principles
Duties of directors are not limited upto the scope of Corporations Act 2001, but they are also required to keep the principles of corporate governance in minds. Corporate governance is a subject that is closely connected to ethics. This subject focuses on the factor that being a director of the company, a person should work for the betterment of all the stakeholders. No there is a need to understand the term stakeholder.
Stakeholder: – This is a wider term then the shareholder. Every person who has some interest in the affairs of a company will be treated as a stakeholder of the company, For instance, employees, government, suppliers, consumers, and investors of a company. A shareholder is one of the most important stakeholders of a company. The reason for that they have their interest in the profits of the company and therefore it becomes the liability of directors to consider their interest while taking business decisions.
However, according to the principles of corporate governance, the directors should consider the interest of every stakeholder and not only shareholders. In the year 2003, Australian Stock Exchanges has published these principles on the subject of corporate governance. These principles require a director to do following tasks.

Recognising and managing risks
Structuring the board
Providing responsible and fair remuneration to directors
Laying down a strong foundation for effective management and oversight
Acting responsibly and ethically
Making balanced and timely disclosures
Safeguarding integrity in corporate reporting

According to the rules and principles of corporate governance, every stakeholder is important for the company in some of the manners. The corporate governance principles motivate the directors of the company for using a stakeholder approach while taking decisions of the company.
Stakeholder Theory: – As the name implies, this theory focuses on the fact that a company should not only consider the interest of the shareholder but the same is required to work for the betterment of it is every stakeholder. The theory says that no doubt a company works for the profits and shareholders are the most valuable stakeholder of every company as the same invest money to the business, yet they are not the only stakeholder. A company needs to understand that as capital is important to run a business, similarly other factors such as the supply of goods and purchase of raw material are also important. A company cannot run it is business depending upon shareholder and hence it becomes the responsibility of directors of a company to take their decision wisely adopting a broader approach.
Many of the cases have been reported in past few years in which it has been noted that directors of a company breached their duties and further stated that they were liable towards the shareholders and not the customers or any other stakeholders. Some of the cases where directors of a company considered only the interest of shareholders is mentioned hereunder.
ASIC v Cassimatis:- In this case, two persons Mr. and Mrs. Cassimatis Were directors of the company named Storm Financial Limited. The company was engaged in the business of providing financial advisory services to the company. Mr. Cassimatis has prepared and suggested a financial model to it is customers, which have been, approved a big failure later on. When the proceedings have initiated against him, he has stated that he is not liable for any kind of breach under Corporations Act, 2001. In the arguments, he said that Corporations Act 2001 only requires a director to act in the interest of the shareholder but not in the interest of customers. In the decision, the court held that director was liable under the act as act provided that being a director one must perform the duties in the best inters of the company and company refers to all stakeholder and not only shareholders.
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Royal Commission case:- In the recent findings of Royal commission, it has been noted that one of the most popular banks of Australia has committed a serious breach of corporate governance principles. As the bank is a listed entity, the corporate governance principles prescribed by ASX are applicable to the company. Royal Commission made an allegation to the bank stating that directors of the same failed to provide some important disclosure regarding 54000 accounts. They have focused to maximize the profits and kept the interest of shareholders in mind. Director and officers of this bank were required to perform their duties for the betterment of all the stakeholders but they did not consider the interest of society and government.
In addition to above two cases, many of the other cases are also there where directors only considered the interest of shareholder or have argued that they are only liable for the stakeholders of the company and not for the stakeholders. This is the reason that amendments in the current law seem to be required.
In order to grant the recommendations, this can be stated that there is no need to make any amendment in current Law. The present sections say that a director and officer of a company must perform his/her obligation for the good faith and best interest of the company.  Nowhere the term shareholder is mentioned. These are the directors and officers who are misinterpreting this term “Company”. Furthermore, to ensure the good corporate governance in an origination the authorities can develops plans and programmes.  In addition to authorities, this is also the individual responsibility of every director to check that whether they are breaching any of the duties while taking a decision or doing any business.
In conjunction with aforesaid, the government can bring some clarification rules in order to clarify the terms and scope of the act. Authorities can initiate some new actions similar to ASX principles to notify the directors and officers that the corporate governance is just another aspect and to follow at each step of working.
As stated above, this is to conclude that many of the directors are not aware of the requirement of the act and in those cases where they are aware, the same has some misunderstandings. These misunderstandings are majorly related to scope and applicability of the act. In many of the cases, directors of a company did something that they have not considered as a breach of duty. People think that shareholders are the most valuable stakeholder as they invest the money in a company. However, this is not true. In every case where such officers and directors failed to perform their duties with respect to other stakeholders, the court has held them liable. The procedure of amendment in an act is a long procedure and therefore the government can initiate something more in this area. No doubt that every officer and director of the company must consider the interest of stakeholders equally. Hence, this is to be stated that amendments in the act is a later stage and firstly government and other authorities should take necessary steps to ensure the use of the stakeholder approach rather than a shareholder.
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
ASIC v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023
Act 2001, related regulations  (CCH Australia Limited, 2011).
Australia, Australian Corporations & Securities Legislation 2011: Corporations Act 2001, ASIC
Sheedy, James and Stephen Baker, Litigating Trust Disputes in Jersey: Law, Procedure & Remedies ( Bloomsbury Publishing, 2017)
Tricker, R. I. (Bob) and Robert Ian Tricker, Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies, and Practices (Oxford University Press, 2015)
Other Resources
AICD, The role of a company director is to govern a company on behalf of the shareholders or members of that company. (31 October 2017) <>.
ASX Corporate overnance Council, Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations (2018) .
Austlii, Corporations Act 2001 – Sect 182 (2018) <>.
Business Dictionary, stakeholder (2018) <>/., Chapter 2d – Officers And Employees (2015) <>.
Smart Sheet, What is stakeeholdee thery and how does it imoacts an organisation? (2018) <>
Smith, D. Gordon and Andrew S. Gold, Research Handbook on Fiduciary Law. (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018), 315 
Stephanie Chalmers, Banking royal commission: commonwealth Bank delayed wiring to overcharged business customers <>
The Guardian, Commonwealth Bank charged fees to dead clients, royal commission hears <>.

Free Membership to World’s Largest Sample Bank

To View this & another 50000+ free samples. Please put
your valid email id.


Yes, alert me for offers and important updates


Download Sample Now

Earn back the money you have spent on the downloaded sample by uploading a unique assignment/study material/research material you have. After we assess the authenticity of the uploaded content, you will get 100% money back in your wallet within 7 days.

UploadUnique Document

DocumentUnder Evaluation

Get Moneyinto Your Wallet

Total 9 pages


*The content must not be available online or in our existing Database to qualify as

Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:


My Assignment Help. (2021). COMMLAW 7012 Corporations Law. Retrieved from

“COMMLAW 7012 Corporations Law.” My Assignment Help, 2021,

My Assignment Help (2021) COMMLAW 7012 Corporations Law [Online]. Available from:[Accessed 19 December 2021].

My Assignment Help. ‘COMMLAW 7012 Corporations Law’ (My Assignment Help, 2021) accessed 19 December 2021.

My Assignment Help. COMMLAW 7012 Corporations Law [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2021 [cited 19 December 2021]. Available from:

.close{position: absolute;right: 5px;z-index: 999;opacity: 1;color: #ff8b00;}


Thank you for your interest
The respective sample has been mail to your register email id


$20 Credited
successfully in your wallet.
* $5 to be used on order value more than $50. Valid for
only 1

Account created successfully!
We have sent login details on your registered email.


Password: is one of the noted service providers that deliver essay help. We provide tailored essay assistance to make sure that student gets online essay help exactly in the way they want it to be written. We at have built teams of consultants, who readily attend every query related to help me writing my essay. We provide essay writing help in forms of tips and steps in order o assist students with tough essay assignments.

Latest Business Law Samples

div#loaddata .card img {max-width: 100%;

BU1112 Business Law
Download :
0 | Pages :

Course Code: BU1112
University: James Cook University is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university

Country: Australia

Part A
Whether Stella is considered as an employee of PRX?
The main difference between employee and independent contractor is stated below:
Employee entered into contract of service, but contractor entered into contract for services.
Employer exercise control over the employee but no control was exercised by employer on contractor. It is considered as traditional test which was developed in Zuijs v Wirth Bros(Zuijs…
Australia South Lake Management health finance management  University of New South Wales 

BSBWHS605 Develop Implement And Maintain WHS Management Systems
Download :
0 | Pages :

Course Code: BSBWHS605
University: Swinburne University Of Technology is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university

Country: Australia

Work Health and Safety Management System (WHSMS) is a collection of plans, tools, activities and processes. List 3 of these plans, tools, activities or processes and explain what they are,
The means, nitty gritty beneath, can be utilized whether the arranging procedure is straightforward or complex. They are:
Evaluating the current word related to wellbeing and security status including the ‘administration framework’ Lussier, R. N…
Australia Brisbane Management Work Health and Safety Management System (WHSMS University of Brisbane MBA 

BUSN331 Business Law
Download :
0 | Pages :

Course Code: BUSN331
University: Centennial College is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university

Country: Canada

In Alberta, the Residential Tenancies Act applies to all the people in this jurisdiction, who rent their space out (Alberta Queen’s Printer, 2016). Through this act, the rights and responsibilities of the landlords and tenants are brought forward (Landlord and Tenant, 2015).
Question 1
Before a tenant can move in the rented accommodation, the tenant and the landlord have to reach an agreement, with regards to the…
Australia Edmonton Humanities Management University of New South Wales Masters in Business Administration 

LA1040 Contract Law
Download :
0 | Pages :

Course Code: LA1040
University: University Of London is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university

Country: United Kingdom

A contract is an agreement between the parties which is enforceable legally in the courts. There are several provisions of law which governs how the terms related to the contract would operate. A contract consists of a set of provisions which are known as contractual terms. The weightage of such terms are not equal as one term may have a more significant consequence as compared to the other in relation to their brea…
United Kingdom London Economics Management University of London 

TLAW202 Corporations Law
Download :
0 | Pages :

Course Code: TLAW202
University: Top Education Institute is not sponsored or endorsed by this college or university

Country: Australia

If any person wants to carry out his business in the form of a company, then, it is necessary that the registration or incorporation requirements of such country must be met. In Australia, the Corporation Act 2001 and the guidelines laid down by ASIC provides with the steps that must be accomplish in order to establish a corporate entity.  (Malbon & Bishop, 2006).
A company is of great significance as it is treated as a …


Need an essay written specifically to meet your requirements?

Choose skilled experts on your subject and get an original paper within your deadline

156 experts online

Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Tips and Tricks from our Blog